| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
God in Public ReasonThe recent suicide bombings in London by young Islamists should remind Christian theologians that they are committed to a liberal polity of some kind. But is a genuinely theological liberalism possible? Many still think that public reason in a liberal polity must be universally accessible and therefore secular; and that it requires those with religious convictions to strip their public speech of theology. Such is the position taken by Jürgen Habermas in a recent newspaper interview. But is Habermas correct to suppose that a theological argument must be inaccessible to non-theologians? This essay returns a negative answer by seeking to demonstrate that a genuinely theological argument for example, about the legalisation of euthanasia can be grasped by non-theologians, can engage them, and might even persuade them. It concludes that on this point the late John Rawls has certain advantages over that of Habermas.
Studies in Christian Ethics, Vol. 19, No. 1,
9-19 (2006) |
|||